The new 2003 Land Law marks an extraordinary change in the land titling
policy in Vietnam. It strongly requires that the names of both the husband and
the wife must be stated on the land use right certificate of the land plot that
they both own. This regulation not only officially recognizes the property
rights of women as land is a crucial asset for every household but it also
improves the position of the wife relatively compared to the husband.

We examine how the intra-couple issues change in association with having
two-name land use certificates which are considered as a legally recognized
proof of property rights for women. We expect some correlation between the
outcome of the two-name land titling policy and the allocation of human
resources between the husband and the wife; the income gap between the
husband and the wife, the investment in their sons and daughters’ education;
and ‘bad’ consumption on smoking and alcohol drinking of the husband which
consumes resources without generating utility (in terms of good health).

We use the data from two waves of Vietnam Household Living Standard
Surveys (VHLSS), before and after the two-name land use certificates came
into effect to identify the correlation. The investigation is conducted for a wide range of outcomes, namely, the difference of the working time that the husband and the wife allocated to the first and the second time consuming jobs; the difference of the wife and the husband’s time doing house work; the difference in individual income of the wife and the husband; the difference in expenses on
their sons and their daughters’ education; the change in expenses on smoking and alcohol drinking. Though divorce is one of the most interesting outcomes that should be investigated, the household survey data observed only a few cases of new divorce in the two year period and does not ensure enough
variations to conduct the analysis. Therefore, we leave the relationship between having two-name land use certificates and divorce unknown. We find that, in association with having two-name land use certificates, the non-Kinh (or nonHoa) wife works for individual income less while the Kinh or Hoa wife seems to work more relatively compared to her husband. The correlation is opposite for the number of hours spent on house work. The difference in house work time of the Kinh wife and her spouse is significant reduced while it turns to increase in the case of non-Kinh couples. This gap also decreases for non-poor couples. Two-name land use certificates seem to be uncorrelated with the income gap between the wife’s and the husband’s personal income. Interestingly, the two-name land use certificates encourage rural couples to invest in their daughters while observing the opposite for urban couples. Finally, we find no correlation between the ownership of two-name land use
certificates and the husband’s bad habits (smoking and drinking).