{"id":8785,"date":"2022-07-27T06:33:46","date_gmt":"2022-07-27T06:33:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/publications\/intra-industry-trade-multilateral-trade-integration-and-invasive-species-risk\/"},"modified":"2022-07-27T06:33:46","modified_gmt":"2022-07-27T06:33:46","slug":"intra-industry-trade-multilateral-trade-integration-and-invasive-species-risk","status":"publish","type":"publications","link":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/publications\/intra-industry-trade-multilateral-trade-integration-and-invasive-species-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"Intra-Industry Trade, Multilateral Trade Integration and Invasive Species Risk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We analyze the linkage between protectionism and invasive species (IS) hazard in the context of<br \/>\ntwo-way trade and multilateral trade integration, two major features of real-world agricultural<br \/>\ntrade. Multilateral integration includes the joint reduction of tariffs and trade costs among trading<br \/>\npartners. Multilateral trade integration is more likely to increase damages from IS than predicted<br \/>\nby unilateral trade opening under the classic Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) framework<br \/>\nbecause domestic production (the base susceptible to damages) is likely to increase with<br \/>\nexpanding export markets. A country integrating its trade with a partner characterized by<br \/>\nrelatively higher tariff and trade costs is also more likely to experience increased IS damages via<br \/>\nexpanded domestic production for the same reason. We illustrate our analytical results with a<br \/>\nstylized model of the world wheat market.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","cate_publications":[],"author_publications":[1598,1599,1600,1601],"topic_publications":[],"class_list":["post-8785","publications","type-publications","status-publish","hentry","author_publications-anh-tu-thuy","author_publications-john-beghin","author_publications-anh-tu-thuy-en","author_publications-john-beghin-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications\/8785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publications"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publications"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"cate_publications","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cate_publications?post=8785"},{"taxonomy":"author_publications","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/author_publications?post=8785"},{"taxonomy":"topic_publications","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depocen.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic_publications?post=8785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}